PS5 Xbox Series X These TVs use the features of the new consoles

Android is a mobile os based upon a customized variation of the Linux kernel and also various other open source software, made mostly for touchscreen mobile phones such as mobile phones and tablets. Android is established by a consortium of programmers understood as the Open Handset Partnership and also commercially funded by Google. It was revealed in November 2007, with the very first commercial Android device, the HTC Dream, being launched in September 2008.
It is complimentary and also open-source software application; its source code is referred to as Android Open Resource Job (AOSP), which is mainly certified under the Apache Permit. Nonetheless most Android devices ship with extra exclusive software program pre-installed, most especially Google Mobile Services (GMS) that includes core applications such as Google Chrome, the electronic distribution platform Google Play as well as associated Google Play Solutions development platform.
Around 70 percent of Android smart devices run Google’s ecosystem; some with vendor-customized interface and software collection, such as TouchWiz as well as later One UI by Samsung, as well as HTC Sense. Completing Android ecological communities and also forks consist of Fire OS (developed by Amazon.com) or LineageOS. Nevertheless the Android name and also logo design are hallmarks of Google which enforce standards to restrict uncertified devices outside their ecological community to make use of Android branding.The source code has actually been used to establish variations of Android on a variety of other electronics, such as video game gaming consoles, electronic cameras, portable media gamers, Computers as well as others, each with a specialized individual interface. Some well recognized derivatives consist of Android TELEVISION for televisions as well as Wear OS for wearables, both developed by Google. Software on Android, which use the APK style, are normally dispersed via proprietary application shops like Google Play Store, Samsung Galaxy Shop, Huawei AppGallery, Cafe Exchange, as well as GetJar, or open source systems like Aptoide or F-Droid.
Android has been the best-selling OS around the world on smartphones given that 2011 and on tablets because 2013. As of Might 2021, it has over three billion monthly active users, the largest set up base of any kind of operating system, and also since January 2021, the Google Play Store features over 3 million apps. The current steady variation is Android 11, released on September 8, 2020.

New in September update: A few old models from 2020 we had to retire due to poor availability, but a few of the models from 2021 have become cheaper. With the Philips PUS9206, we also inserted a new 4K TV with Ambilight and HDMI 2.1. In addition, we supplemented some data at the OLEDS by Panasonic.

Both the PS5 and the Xbox Series X support in principle 8K resolution and 120 fps at 4K. With how many games this will be possible in practice, is still largely open. Who wants to be prepared for all cases, should still be careful when buying the next TV, to choose a device that is future-proof.

This means: You need a TV that not only has a 4K resolution display and a refresh rate of 120 Hz, but also through an HMDI-2.1 port. In this article we introduce you to some of the best models of different price ranges and also explain what it has with HDMI 2.1.

This purchase advice is not commissioned by one advertising partner, but a list of recommendations. The offers listed here are but with so-called affiliate links. With a purchase via one of these links your Local Dimming supports: without impact on the price we get a small commission from the provider. Do you have suggestions for articles that we should record? Write it in the comments.

Contents

  • What brings HDMI 2.1 for Gaming?
  • Which TVs support HDMI 2.1?
  • LG: The largest selection
  • Samsung: HDMI 2.1 on a port
  • Sony: HDMI 2.1 now without problems
  • Tcl: Now also HDMI 2.1 in the 4K area
  • Philips: HDMI 2.1 in 2021 from the upper middle class
  • Panasonic: HDMI 2.1 from 2021 at OLEDs
  • Xiaomi: Genuine HDMI 2.1 probably only at 86 inches

What brings HDMI 2.1 for gaming?

Full HDMI 2.1 has a bandwidth of 48 Gbit / s compared to 18 GBit / s at HDMI 2.0B. In principle, this enables the playback of 8K content with 60 fps or 4K content with up to 120 fps. For TVs with HDMI 2.0, only 60 fps are possible at 4K. While gaming is currently unrealistic in 8K resolution, at least less complex titles can achieve more than 60 fps at 4K. Incidentally, many current 4K TVs have limited HDMI 2.1 with approx. 40 GBit / s. This is still 4K with 120 fps possible, but it can be due to restrictions e.g. in the color depth.

In addition to 4k 120 fps, the following features are often brought in conjunction with HDMI 2.1:

  • Variable Refresh Rate (VRR): With VRR, the TV can adapt to the mountain rate of the console. This prevents screen tearing while playing and reduces input.
  • Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM): ALLM AllM allows the console to automatically put the TV in the lowest latency mode and so on low input.
  • Enhanced Audio Return Chanel (Earc): EARC allows the TV to transfer sound with high bandwidth to external sound systems. Thus, formats such as Dolby Atmos and DTS: X can be played uncompressed, which is important above all for elaborate surround sound systems.

However, these three features are in principle but also without real HDMI 2.1 and should not be understood as proof that the television actually has a connection with the full bandwidth of 48 GBit / s.

By the way: If you decide for the Xbox Series S , you do not need HDMI 2.1. The console is designed to play at 1440p at up to 120 fps, which is also possible with HDMI 2.0B, which is now standard. In fact, the Xbox Series s has an HDMI 2.1 port, the supplied cable can not exploit its bandwidth. Microsoft apparently does not expect HDMI 2.1 for the Series S to play a major role.

Which TVs support HDMI 2.1?

This question is not so easy to answer, especially since some televisions support certain features, but still do not fully meet the HDMI 2.1 standard. For this reason, we explain to you below exactly what you can expect from which manufacturer.

__97 __3

more on the subject

New TV for PS5 & Xbox Series X: Everything about HDMI 2.1, 8K & more

__

In general, your TVS with HDMI 2.1 has only been found in 4K TVs of the middle and upper class, which have a display with 100 or 120 Hertz. TVs that come only to 1080p or have a 50/60 Hertz panel, do not use the bandwidth of HDMI 2.1 anyway. At 8K TV HDMI 2.1, however, is the standard.

LG: The largest selection

HDMI 2.1 Already in the middle class: LG currently offers the largest selection of TVs with HDMI-2.1 support. The high-quality OLED TVs have been fulfilling the standard since 2019. Also, some of the normal LEDs of the SM series from 2019 and the Nano series from 2020 and 2021 offer HDMI 2.1. Even in the UN series from 2020, which actually consists of low-budget devices, there is a corresponding model with the LG UN8500.

Restrictions for models from 2020: The 4K models from 2020, however, have no full HDMI 2.1, but a slightly limited version that rather 40 instead provides 48 GBit / s. 120 fps at 4k are still possible anyway, but the color depth is limited to 10 bits. Since the displays of the models only support only 10 bits natively, there is hardly a difference in practice. The same restriction also applies to the new models from 2021. For 8K TVs, of course, there is the full bandwidth, here it is also necessary.

LG OLED C1: Even better for gaming

  • Display: 4K, OLED
  • HDMI 2.1: 4 x, slightly limited
  • Price: approx. 1,500 Euro at 55 inches

Standstill at a high level: In the picture quality, almost nothing changed compared to the transactions. The image brightness seems to have gone a bit more at the C1, the difference is minimal. The new and lighter OLED EVO panels are only available from the G1. But that’s not bad, because the picture quality was already outstanding at the CX. Of course you will also get the C1 again the perfect black for OLEDs and the infinitely high contrast.

Even better for gaming: HDMI 2.1 still exists on all four ports. It is like the models from 2020 μM connections with slightly limited bandwidth, which do not quite reach the full 48 GBit / s. In practice, this hardly makes a difference. The INPUT was lowered again compared to its predecessor, at about 10 ms at 60 Hz and about 5.3 ms at 120 Hz. In addition, VRR is now also working for framerates under 40 fps.

LG OLED C1 at Mediamarkt *

LG OLED B1: Customized quality

  • Display: 4K, OLED
  • HDMI 2.1: 2 x, slightly limited
  • Price: approx. 1,300 euros at 55 inches

Hardly changed: The LG OLED B1 has hardly changed compared to the predecessor LG OLED BX. It still offers a very high picture quality, but not completely attributable to the C1 due to the lower peak brightness and the weaker image processor. With the LG OLED A1 this year there is an even more favorable OLED model, which is almost equal to the picture quality with the B1, but only a 60 Hz display and accordingly no real HDMI 2.1 offers.

All gaming features: LG B1 has two HDMI 2.1 connections like its predecessor, with which 120 fps are possible at 4K resolution without problems. The INPUT was very low as with LG OLED C1 and how the more expensive model also supports the B1 VRR in all common variants (Freesync, G-Sync, VRR Nahc HDMI-2.1 specifications). The advantage of the C1 is that it has four HDMI-2.1 connections, but of course only relevant if you have other devices next to the PS5 and DE Xbox Series X, which use the fast connection.

LG OLED B1 at Amazon *

LG NANO86: middle class with EDGE display

  • Display: 4K, Edge LED (IPS)
  • HDMI: 2 x restricted HDMI 2.1, 2 x HDMI 2.0
  • Price: approx. 870 Euro at 55 inches (model from 2021)

Almost identical: The NANO86 exists in a version of 2020 (NANO867) and a version of 2021 (NANO869) is the cheapest LG model with HDMI-2.1 support. The old, in the meantime, almost sold-out version has often been seen for well below 800 euros at 55 inches, the slightly improved new version is likely to become ahead sooner or later. The LG Nano86 has two of the slightly restricted HDMI-2.1 connections. With an input of about 12 ms at 60 Hz (with Nano867: 16 ms) or 6 ms at 120 Hz, he is well suited for gaming.

Weak contrast: The image quality is satisfactory for a mid-range device, but can not compete with that of OLED TVs. Above all, the contrast is low at NANO86 because an IPS panel is used with EDGE lighting. After all, this ensures a low viewing angle dependence, which may be beneficial if you gather in the group for common Zock in front of the TV. In addition, the Nanocell coating improves color reproduction.

LG Nano86 at MediaMarkt *

LG NANO91: More quality with Fald Display

  • Display: 4K, Direct LED (IPS)
  • HDMI: 2 x restricted HDMI 2.1, 2 x HDMI 2.0
  • Price: approx. 950 Euro at 55 inches (version 2021)

Price-performance compromise: The LG Nano91 is a good compromise for those who want good quality, but do not want to spend much money for an OLED. It originally comes from 2020, but was reissued in 2021 in a slightly revised form. In Germany we mostly used the 2020 version as NANO917, which sold 2021s as NANO919. The differences between the vintages are barely noticeable. Like the BX or the NANO86, the NANO91 offers two limited HDMI 2.1 ports, MTI are no problem of those 4k 120 fps.

Better thanks to Direct LED: Qualitatively, the Nano91 is superior to the LG Nano86 mainly through its display with Direct LED and Full Array Local Dimming (Fald). The entire screen is divided into zones whose brightness is individually adapted to the scene. The INPUT was at the 2020 version 15 ms with 60 Hz and 6 ms with 120 Hz, with the 2021 version, it is even lower with 5 ms at 120 Hz and 11 to 12 ms at 120 Hz.

LG Nano90 at Amazon *

LG UN8500: Big screen, small price?

  • Display: 4K, Direct LED (IPS, at 82 inches VA)
  • HDMI: 2 x restricted HDMI 2.1, 2 x HDMI 2.0
  • Price: CIRCA 1.500 Euro at 82 inches

Large and bad Available: The LG UN8500 could be the only low-budget TV in the market with HDMI 2.1, the price would be due to poor availability in Germany (in Austria it looks a bit better) so far not clear higher than the quality is appropriate. One exception is the largest versions in 82 and 86 inches, which is now at many German dealers at reasonable prices. Theoretically, the model is available from 65 inches.

HDMI 2.1, but low-budget quality: In contrast to other TVs of the UN series from 2021, the UN8500 has not only a 120 Hz display, but also two HDMI 2.1 ports and a Nanocell display . So he would have to belong to the middle class models of the Nano series. In tests, however, shows that he is not superior to low-budget models such as the UN7300 in the image quality, among other things due to the low peak brightness. So you have to ask if HDMI 2.1 and 120 Hz alone are worth the surcharge compared to the other un- or UP models from 2021.

LG UN8500 at Amazon *

Samsung: HDMI 2.1 on a port

HDM 2.1 at QLEDS: All Samsung QLED models from 2020 from the Q70T upward HDMI 2.1 supports on a port. Only the cheap Q60T and the Q80T with 49 inches that only have a 50/60 Hz panel remain limited to HDMI 2.0. The same applies to the models from 2021. Here, too, HDMI 2.1 is available from the Q70A. Only the smallest versions of Q70A and Q80A are exempted because they only have a 60 Hz panel. The Q60A generally offers only 60 Hz.

Only on a port: As 2020, in 2021, the 4K TVs HDMI 2.1 usually only on a single port. The exception is the high-end model QN95A, which as the 8K models is to supply full HDMI 2.1 on all four ports. The 2020er models have only limited HDMI 2.1 with approx. 40 GBit / s instead of 48 Gbps, similar to the TVs of LG. That should also be the case with the 2021 models. However, practical tests show no problems with 4k 120 Hz, not even at the same time HDR.

Samsung Q70A: Good contrast

  • Display: 4K, VA panel
  • HDMI 2.1: 1 x on port 4 (from 55 inches)
  • Price: CIRCA 1,160 Euro at 55 inches

Good picture quality: The Samsung Q70A has hardly changed from the previous year compared to Q70T. It still has a high-contrast VA display, which is a great advantage over the Q80A. FULL ARRAY LOCAL DIMMING does not get her at the Q70A. In addition, the peak brightness in the Q70A is much lower than the Q80A, which is why HDR can not take advantage of it. Nevertheless, here you get a high picture quality for the price range.

HDMI 2.1 from 55 inches: The Q70A is the cheapest model with HDMI 2.1 under Samsung 4K TVs with 120 Hz and HDMI 2.1. However, this only applies to models from 55 inches. Smaller variants have only 60 Hz according to the current state. However, such in the market are hard to find, one of the few exceptions is the Samsung GQ43Q70A. In the INPUT, the Q70A is very well cut at about 10 to 11 ms at 60 Hz and 5.6 ms at 120 Hz.

Samsung Q70a at Mediamarkt *

Samsung Q80A: No more VA panel

  • Display: 4K, ADS panel (similar to IPS)
  • HDMI 2.1: 1 x on port 4 (from 55 inches)
  • Price: 1,150 euros at 55 inches

Weak contrast, but other strengths: Because it uses an ADS panel instead of a VA Panel, the contrast of the Q80A is much lower than that of the predecessor Q80T. The QN85A also places on Ads, but can partially compensate for the disadvantages through its mini LEDs. The Q80A, however, ultimately offers little better image quality than the VA Panel Q70A. After all, he has Full Array Local Dimming, a higher peak brightness and a good sound system.

Once HDMI 2.1, very low input was: What HDMI 2.1 is concerned, nothing has done. After all, there is only one of the fast connections, which but at least does his job done easily. But beware: Only models from 55 inch offer a 120 Hz display and correct HDMI 2.1! The 50-inch version must get along with 60 Hz. Incidentally, the INPUT decreases at 9.5 ms at 60 Hz and 5.3 ms at 120 Hz again extremely low.

Samsung Q80a at Mediamarkt *

Samsung QN85A: New mini LEDs

  • Display: 4K, QLED with Mini LED, Ads
  • HDMI 2.1: 1 x on port 4
  • Price: 1,400 Euro at 55 inches

Smaller LEDs, more brightness: The QN85A is Samsung’s cheapest QLED television from 2021 with the new mini LEDs. That means: The light-emitting diodes are smaller, but their number is much higher. Among other things, this ensures better Local Dimming and for a higher peak brightness, which benefits especially the representation of HDR. The QN85A must be noted that it has no low contrast without Local Dimming because it uses a display with IPS-like technique.

Little movement at HDMI 2.1: As far as HDMI 2.1 is concerned, it seems to have changed too much compared to the previous year. The quick connection we get again on only one port. In any case, if there are any limitations of the bandwidth, they seem hard to make themselves noticeable in practice, because according to tests, the Samsung QN85A 4K resolution at 120 Hz can also be easily present with simultaneous HDR. VRR and ALLM are also supported.

Samsung QN85A at MediaMarkt *

Samsung QN90A: even more brightness

  • Display: 4K, QLED with Mini-LED, VA
  • HDMI 2.1: 1 x on port 4
  • Price: 1,520 euros at 55 inches

Still brighter and better contrast: The Samsung QN90A features the QN85A over the new mini LED technology, which ensures excellent local dimming and a very high top brightness. The latter is particularly impressive in the QN90A with about 1,800 cd / m2. In contrast to the QN85A, the QN90A still has a pretty good contrast even without Local Dimming because it has a VA panel. An additional coating ensures that the viewing angle dependence, which is otherwise a problem with VA panels, is not too high.

The usual gaming features: With regard to the gaming features, the QN90A hardly offers advantages over the cheaper Samsung QN85A. HDMI 2.1 is only available here on one of the four ports. The INPUT was 5.3 ms at 120 Hz and a good 10 ms at 60 Hz here as well as there is extremely low. Whether the surcharge is worth, therefore, above all depends on how important you are the better picture quality that makes itself noticeable without Local Dimming. By the way, Local Dimming also works quite well when playing, which is why you probably do not want to turn it off too often.

Samsung Qn90a at Mediamarkt *

Samsung QLED Q70T: middle class with good contrast

  • Display: 4K, QLED
  • HDMI: 1 x restricted HDMI 2.1, 3 x HDMI 2.0
  • Price: approx. 1,000 euros at 55 inches

Very good contrast: The Q70T is the cheapest Samsung model from 2020, which offers 120 fps at 4K resolution. For gaming, it is very well suited, thanks to an input lag of about 10 ms at 60 Hz or 6 ms at 120 Hz. Qualitatively, it is higher than that’s even more cheaper LG Nano86, as it offers the significantly better contrast. For this, the LG Nano86 is at least less viewing angle dependent. The successor Q70A differs qualitatively hardly from the Q07T.

Moderate brightness: Samsung QLED technology ensures improved color reproduction, which alone weighs the advantages of the excellent black values ​​of an OLED but not. More expensive Samsung models like the Q90T can partially compensate by their brightness, which lacks their black depth. The Q70T does not succeed with a peak brightness between 400 and 500 cd / m2. At the moment, it still offers the best price-performance ratio under Samsung Qled TVs. However, he will probably not be available for a long time.

Samsung Q70T at Amazon *

Samsung QLED Q80T: The compromise

  • Display: 4K, QLED
  • HDMI: 1 x restricted HDMI 2.1, 3 x HDMI 2.0
  • Price: about 1,200 Euro at 55 inches

Good compromise: The Samsung Q80T is a good compromise between price and performance. With a peak brightness of over 700 cd / m2, he can use HDR a good deal better than the Q70T, although it is far away from the blinding brightness of the Q90T. Unlike Q70T, it also has just like the Q90T via Full Array Local Dimming. Compared to the successor Q80A, the Q80T is the better TV because it provides the significantly higher contrast.

When gaming: The gaming properties have no significant differences to other QLEDs from Samsung. With an input of about 10 ms at 60 Hz and 5 to 6 ms at 120 Hz, the Q80T is just as excellent for gambling as the Q70T. Whether the surcharge is worthwhile depends solely on how important you are the higher picture quality.

Samsung Q80T at Amazon *

Samsung QLED Q90T: Especially bright

  • Display: 4K, QLED
  • HDMI: 1 x restricted HDMI 2.1, 3 x HDMI 2.0
  • Price: 1,350 euros at 55 inches

The upper class: The Q90T belongs to the upper class under Samsung 4K TVs. The INPUT was as low as the Q70T and Q80T, but the peak brightness is much higher depending on the settings with approx. 1,150 to 1,400 CD / M2, so that the TV can get the most out of HDR. In addition, Local Dimming (which is already included in the Q80T) for excellent contrast. Nevertheless, the OLEDs of LG still cut slightly better in image quality.

Many alternatives: The Samsung Q90T has a heavy booth in its price range, as he has to measure with OLED TVs like the LG BX and CX, which offer a little more in the image quality. If you have the highest demands on the picture quality, will probably access the OLED TVs of the competition at this price. If, on the other hand, if you are satisfied with less, you can also spend a few hundred euros less for models like the Q80T or the Q70T.

Samsung Q90T at Amazon *

Samsung QLED Q800T: Better by 8K

  • Display: 8K, QLED

CDK Day 2020 - Multi-account and multi-region - Deploy your CDK app to multiple environments
* HDMI: 4 x full HDMI 2.1
* Price: approx. 1,900 Euro at 65 inches

Cheaper, but not cheap: The Q800T is Samsung’s cheapest 8K TV with full HDMI 2.1 from 2020. The price of the smallest variant (65 inches) has now dropped from 3,000 euros to less than 2,000 euros. The contrast is not as high as otherwise with VA panels because Samsung sets an additional filter layer that reduces viewing angle dependency. However, this is similar to the Q800T by very good full array local dimming with 480 zones and a tremendous high peak brightness of over 1,300 cd / m2. He is superior to the 8K TV LG Nano99 (only badly available) and even more favorable.

Good, but not better: The INPUT was at about 10 ms at 60 Hz and just under 6 ms at 120 Hz as low as the 4K-QLEDs. Incidentally, the image quality is not better than in the Q80T or Q90T for the overall 8K resolution. However, since you can hardly benefit from 8K when playing for foreseeable time, the surcharge is not worthwhile if you are primarily about a TV for gaming.

Samsung QLED Q800T at Alternate *

Samsung QLED Q950T: The top Qled TV

  • Display: 8K, QLED
  • HDMI: 4 x full HDMI 2.1
  • Price: approx. 3,500 Euro at 65 inches

Samsung’s best QLED 2020: The 8K TV Samsung Q950T is the top model under Samsung QLEDs from 2020. The smallest version with 65 inches still cost about 3,500 euros, although the price has already fallen significantly. As usual at 8K TVs, it has full HDMI 2.1. Compared to the Samsung Q800T, he is characterized by higher image quality, among other things because of even better Local Dimming, and his slim design. The frame of the Q950T is extremely thin and the TV itself is only 15 mm thick.

Too expensive as a pure gaming TV: The design of the Q950T is especially benefiting when you want to hang it on the wall. For players who are not worth it, the price is unlikely to be worthwhile, because they basically get the Q800T more than they need. In principle, the Q950T is with its low input but was just as well suited as a gaming TV as all the current QLEDs from Samsung.

Samsung QLED Q950T at MediaMarkt *

Sony: HDMI 2.1 now without problems

Magere selection 2020: Ironically, console manufacturer Sony initially weakened in supporting HDMI 2.1. Only two models from 2020 support the standard, namely the 8K television ZH8 and the 4K LED TV XH90 marketed in various variants (e.g., XH9005, XH9007, XH9096, XH9288, XH9299). The latter, however, has problems with the playback of 4K 120 fps in color resolution chroma 4: 4: 4.

2021 full HDMI 2.1 at OLEDs and in the upper middle class: 2021 also get the OLED TVs such as the Sony A80J and the Sony A90J HDMI 2.1. According to tests, there are no problems with 4k 120 fps, not even with color resolution chroma 4: 4: 4. The same applies to the successor of the XH90, the Sony X90J. Even the more cheaper Sony X85j has HDMI 2.1. However, as far as VRR is concerned, Sony lasts a future update as in the last year.

Sony OLED A90J: HDMI 2.1 For now without VRR

  • Display: 4K, OLED
  • HDMI 2.1: 2 x on port 3 and 4
  • Price: approximately 2.120 euros at 55 inches

HDMI 2.1, but no VRR: 2020 there was only a 4K model with HDMI 2.1 from Sony with the Sony XH90 and even with this there were problems. In 2021 everything should become better and, in fact, the new Sony OLED A90J has two HDMI 2.1 connections, with which 4k 120 Hz no longer represents a problem. However, what still does not work is VRR. While this is to be supplied by update, but we have heard the same last year by the Sony XH90. We wait for this update until today.

Great picture, but no 1440p: In addition to VRR, the support of 1440p resolution is missing. By the way, both are also valid for the PS5. With the decision to make the TV only support what the in-house console supports, Sony should not be friends for Xbox owners. The INPUT was at about 12 ms at 120 Hz and 17 ms at 60 Hz quite low, but other manufacturers also cut off even better. To highlight positively, in addition to a generally excellent image quality, the very liquid representation faster movements.

Sony A90J at Mediamarkt *

Sony A80J: Almost as well

  • Display: 4K, OLED
  • HDMI 2.1: 2x on port 3 and 4
  • Price: approx. 1,700 Euro at 55 inches

The usual Sony properties: The A80J is Sony’s cheapest OLED model 2021. HDMI 2.1 is available as usual with Sony twice, on ports 3 and 4. The input was slightly lower at 120 Hz with 9 ms than At the Sony A90J, at 60 Hz, it is approximately equal to around 17 ms. Also at the A80J, there are the usual Sony restrictions: 1440p is not supported natively and VRR will eventually be supplied via update.

The better value for money: The Sony A80J offers, as usual with OLED TVs, excellent image quality thanks to deep black and infinitely high contrast. Also compared to other OLED TVs, he beats well, he is about to classify about the level of LG OLED C1. Compared to the more expensive Sony A90J is slightly inferior, among other things due to lower peak brightness. The difference is hardly falling up, which is why the A80J offers the better value for money. Currently both models are still too expensive.

Sony A80J at OTTO *

Sony X90J: almost problem-free

  • Display: 4K, VA
  • HDMI 2.1: 2 x on port 3 and 4
  • Price: 1,349 euros at 55 inches

Almost no problems with HDMI 2.1: In contrast to its predecessor Sony XH90, there are almost no problems with HDMI 2.1 at the X90J. With both connections, 4k 120 Hz works without difficulty, even with Chroma 4: 4: 4. However: 4k 120 Hz with simultaneous Dolby Vision does not work with the Xbox Series X. In addition, VRR still does not work, Sony is powered on a later update. The resolution 1440p is not supported as the PS5. This can be annoying if using the PC or Xbox Series.

Very good picture: The INPUT was located at about 18 ms at 60 Hz and 11 ms at 120 Hz in a good area. At its predecessor, he was still 3 to 4 ms lower. The picture quality is again very good. Here, the X90J also cuts slightly better compared to the XH90, thanks to higher peak brightness and slightly elevated contrast. Full Array Local Dimming is also back and works very well, even in gaming mode. Nevertheless, OLEDs does not come up, but with Samsung Mini LEDs, he can at least reach nearly.

Sony X90J at Mediamarkt *

Sony X85J: Good middle class

  • Display: 4K, VA
  • HDMI 2.1: 2 X on port 3 and 4
  • Price: approx. 1,280 Euro at 55 inches

Sony’s cheapest HDMI 2.1 model: The Sony X85J is 2021 the cheapest model of Sony with HDMI 2.1. It has two HDMI-2.1 connections, which 4k 120 fps can be played. Similar to the Sony XH90 in the previous year, it can come to chroma 4: 4: 4 problems like slightly blurry text. However, these do not always occur. The INPUT was 6.3 ms at 120 Hz and a good 15 ms at 60 Hz even slightly lower than the more expensive Sony X90J. Like other Sony models, the X85j does not support a resolution of 1440p native and also VRR is first supplied by an update, as with the PS5.

Good mid-range quality: The image quality shines the Sony X85j through a high contrast of the VA display. Nevertheless, he can not keep up with the X90J because Full Array Local Dimming is missing and the peak brightness in HDR is much lower. Overall, the Sony X85J offers good middle class quality and is about to compare with the Samsung Q70A. At the moment he is unfortunately too expensive for what he offers.

Sony X85J at Saturn *

Sony XH90 / XH92: high quality with fald

  • Display: 4K, Direct LED
  • HDMI: 2 x restricted HDMI 2.1, 2 x HDMI 2.0
  • Price: CIRCA 800 EURO at 55 inches

Good quality: The XH9005 moves, as well as the technically almost identical variants (XH9077, XH9096, XH9288, XH9299), regarding image quality approximately at the level of the Samsung Q80T. As this he has Full Array Local Dimming. The entire display is thus divided into zones whose brightness is individually adapted to the scene. The contrast is with 4267: 1 or 4786: 1 with Local Dimming even a good deal higher than the more expensive XH9505. In the peak brightness, however, he is inferior, but still cuts well with just under 740 cd / m2.

reacts quickly: The input was at a good 15 ms with 60 Hz and 7 ms with 120 Hz. Thus, the Sony XH90 is very suitable for the gaming. Also in this regard, he is superior to the more expensive XH9505 (19 ms at 60 Hz, 11 ms at 120 Hz). The HDMI 2.1 support did not work for the release. Meanwhile, a firmware update is supported at least 120 fps at 4K, but with restrictions in the color resolution chroma 4: 4.4. If you use these, there are sausages in the picture quality. For this he is currently much cheaper than the successor X90J, who does not have this problem.

Sony XH90 at Saturn *

Sony ZH8: The usual 8K quality

  • Display: 8K, Direct LED
  • HDMI: 4 x HDMI 2.1
  • Price: approx. 4,200 Euro at 75 inches

Sony’s high-end model: The Sony ZH8 is a high-end model and offers much more than the Samsung Q950T much more than you need as a gamer. The 8K TV is available in sizes 75 and 85 inches. The prices for the smaller variant has now fallen to a good 4,000 euros. Thus, the ZH8 is much cheaper than the older ZG9, whose prices are still in the five-digit area today.

High performance and many features: Of course you also get a lot for the high price of the ZH8, such as the powerful X1-Ultimate processor, Full Array Local Dimming and a 4.2 speaker system that supports Dolby Atmos. You can also get many of the features for much less money if you are satisfied with 4K resolution and smaller image. Even with the ZH8 you have to ask yourself as a player, so if the high resolution is really worth the money.

Sony ZH8 at OTTO *

TCL: Now HDMI 2.1 in the 4K area

HDMI 2.1 From the C72 +: For TCL, HDMI 2.1 hitherto almost only in the 8K range, for example at the X915. The models hardly played a role in the German market. In 2021, HDMI 2.1 is now already in the 4K middle class, namely the C72 +, which is also on the market in this country as C728. The high-end model C82, which works like the Samsung QN90A mini LEDs, should support HDMI 2.1.

All important gaming features: For both models, all four HDMI connections should comply with the HDMI 2.1 standard and provide 4k 120 fps. Also VRR and ALLM should be supported. Incidentally, the latter also applies to the most favorable C72 and C725, but which can not represent 4k 120fps due to its 60 Hz display.

TCL C728: Lots of features

  • Display: VA, QLED
  • HDMI 2.1: on all four ports
  • Price: 880 Euro at 55 inches

Good middle class quality: The TCL C728x1 is the common variant of the C72 + usual in Germany. The C728 uses a VA panel with a good contrast of about 4000: 1. Direct LED ensures uniform illumination of the screen, but Local Dimming is not available. There is a QLED filter layer, which ensures better color reproduction. In addition, the C728 is equipped with an onkyo sound system, which offers a total power of 40 watts. The top brightness is rather low. With about 300 cd / m2 in SDR and around 350 cd / m2 in HDR, the C728 does not offer much more than a low-budget TV.

Gaming features and OS: HDMI 2.1 is available on all four ports, VRR and ALLM are supported. According to the manufacturer, the INPUT was below 15 ms, according to independent measurements, it should even be 13 ms. The Android-based operating system provides good app support. Also voice control is available. For his price, the TCL C728 has a lot to offer.

Tcl C728 at Mediamarkt *

Philips: HDMI 2.1 in 2021 from the upper middle class

Twice full HDMI 2.1: Philips wants not only in 2021 with respect to HDMI 2.1, but even overtake many of his competitors. From the Philips PUS9206 upwards, so from the upper middle class, all models with two full-fledged HDMI-2.1 connectors are equipped. This applies to both the new Mini LEDs PML9506 and PML9636 as well as for all OLEDs. Thus, Philips televisions are better equipped than most of the current QLED models from Samsung.

Ambilight and Android: All of the Philips televisions equipped with HDMI 2.1 feature ambilight and run with Android. Cheaper models from the Philips PUS8506 downhill unfortunately have no HDMI 2.1, but should be equipped with VRR. The somewhat limited in-house operating system SAPHI is used only with low-budget models as the PUS7506. .

Philips PUS9206: HDMI 2.1 & Ambilight 4

  • Display: 4K, Direct LED (VA, at 65 inch IPs)
  • HDMI 2.1: 2 x full bandwidth
  • Price: CIRCA 1.500 Euro at 55 inches

Full HDMI 2.1 with VRR and Allm: The PUS9206 is the cheapest 4K TV from Philips from 2020, which has real HDMI 2.1. Although the paper has the cheaper PUS8506 HDMI-2.1 connections, it only has a 60 Hz display. 4K 120 FPS therefore only exists at the PUS9206 and the more expensive mini LED or OLED TVs. Also allm and VRR are supported here. Unfortunately we are missing for the input of the PUS9206 still reliable data. Based on our experiences with other Philips models, we would expect about 20 ms at 60 Hz.

Android and Ambilight: What the picture is concerned, the PUS9206 offers good middle-class quality, but without special features like Fald. Unfortunately, he is still very expensive for that right now. After all, the Philips PUS9206 has four-sided ambilight. At Ambilight, the wall is illuminated behind the TV in the colors of the picture, which is very impressive, especially in dark spaces. While some of the cheaper Philips models have to do with the somewhat limited operating system Saphi, the PUS9206 offers Android and thus very good app support.

Philips PUS9206 at Amazon *

Philips OLED706: Great picture & Ambilight 3

  • Display: 4K, OLED
  • HDMI 2.1: 2 X on port 3 and 4
  • Price: CIRCA 1,800 Euro at 55 inches

A few features less: The Philips OLED706 is the cheapest OLED model of the current generation at Philips. Compared to the more expensive models OLED806 and OLED856, there are a few smaller features that serve, for example, the calibration. He also has only three instead of four pages ambilight. At Ambilight, the wall is illuminated behind the TV in the colors of the image to make the screen look bigger and ensure suitable atmosphere.

Full HDMI 2.1: Image quality is very high as usual with OLED TVs very high through perfect black and infinitely high contrast. As far as the gaming features are concerned, the OLED706 offers both allm and VRR, but probably only from 40 fps upwards. HDMI 2.1 should give it to two connections, with full 48 Gbps, so it should not be problems with chroma 4: 4: 4. Unfortunately we have no test results that confirm this information. Also for Input we missed the data so far.

Philips OLED706 at Mediamarkt *

Philips OLED806 & 856: Highest Quality & Ambilight 4

  • Display: 4K, OLED
  • HDMI 2.1: 2 X on port 3 and 4
  • Price: approximately 2,000 euros at 55 inches

Four-sided Ambilight: The Philips OLED806 and OLED856 will trade in Germany at the end of July 2021. The two models are technically hardly different from each other, but have different feet. Compared to the cheaper OLED706, they offer four-sided ambilight, which is especially relevant when you want to hang the TV on the wall. In addition, there are a few additional features that serve, for example, color calibration and adaptation to the lighting of the room.

Open questions: Whether there are other advantages related to image quality such as e.g. gives a higher peak brightness is still unclear. Also data for input was missing us. As with OLED706, there should be allm and VRR (at least from 40 fps upwards). Likewise, two HDMI 2.1 connections should be present with the full 48 Gbps, which allow 120 fps at 4K resolution without problems. Again, we rely on the details of the manufacturer, we have not yet.

Philips OLED856 at OTTO *

Panasonic: HDMI 2.1 from 2021 at OLEDs

Misunderstandings: Panasonic TVs are often claimed to support HDMI 2.1 from the GXW804 mid-range model originating from 2019. In fact, these models only support allm and are far from full HDMI 2.1 away. The GXW804 could not provide 120 fps at 4K anyway because it only has a 50/60 Hz panel.

2020 No HDMI 2.1, 2021 At least at OLEDs: Similarly, the 2020er models of the HXW and HZW series looks like. Again, there is only allm from the HXW804 upward, the high-quality OLEDs of the HZW series also have EARC. VRR and 120 FPS at 4K there is no. 2021 have at least the OLEDs via HDMI 2.1. As it looks like cheaper models, there will still be shown.

Panasonic OLED JZW984, JZW1004, JZW2004

  • Display: 4K, OLED
  • HDMI 2.1: 2 x slightly limited to port 1 and 2
  • Price: CIRCA 1.800 € (JZW984), 2,000 € (JZW1004), 3,000 € (JZW2004) at 55 inches

HDMI 2.1 For all OLED models: All three Panasonic OLED TVs from JZW984 and JZW1004 to the most exposed model, the JZW2004, have HDMI 2.1. The bandwidth is slightly limited as with the OLEDs of LG slightly limited to about 40 Gbps, 4k 120 fps are still possible. This applies to HDMI ports 1 and 2, which also supports VRR. Allm is available on all four ports.

Input was improved: Panasonic has significantly reduced the input in the new OLEDs. While in the previous year was still at more than 20 ms, he should now be only 14.4 ms at 60 Hz at the JZW2004. Unfortunately, we have no measurement data for JZW984 and JZW1004, but the values ​​should not be very different. At the picture, the Panasonic models do not last very well with their strong image processors. The JZW984 has the slightly weaker panel. The JZW2004 is characterized by even higher image quality compared to the JZW1004, but also through a very high quality sound system.

Panasonic JZW1004 at MediaMarkt *

Xiaomi: Genuine HDMI 2.1 probably only at 86 inches

Legal, but misleading: There are already several 4K TVs from Xiaomi, which have officially available via HDMI 2.1. But not always it is correct HDMI 2.1. The 75-inch Xiaomi Mi TV Q1 (RRP: 1.299 €) only supports 4K 60 Hz with simultaneous EARC. Allm is also there. However, there are only 120 Hz at lower resolutions. Nevertheless, Xiaomi advertises with HDMI 2.1 is legal. According to HDMI Licensing, manufacturers are allowed even if the devices only support some features of HDMI 2.1 as long as they name them. That’s exactly what Xiaomi does with Earc. Customer-friendly this practice is not exactly.

Genuine HDMI 2.1 at Xiaomi RedMi max 86: Unlike the Xiaomi Q1, the Xiaomi Redmi Max 86 seems to provide real HDMI 2.1. The 86-inch 4K TV supports 4K 120 Hz, Allm and VRR according to reports. However, there are no extensive tests of the model. Anyway, it is hard to tell if the two TVs will ever play a bigger role in the German market. The Q1 is theoretically already in the trade in this country, but in practice but currently hard to get.

__229 __2

more on the subject

The Best Gaming 4K TVs – Comparison for PS4, PS5, Xbox One & Xbox Series

__

  • This purchase advice is not commissioned by a promotional partner, but a list of recommendations. The offers listed here are but with so-called affiliate links. With a purchase via one of these links your Local Dimming supports: without impact on the price we get a small commission from the provider. Do you have suggestions for articles that we should record? Write it in the comments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *